Tuesday, December 02, 2008

Realistically This Could Be Anyone

From the Charlottesville Craigslist, thanks to an anonymous tipster.

So I grabbed a handful of condoms yesterday - m4w - 26 (near Scott Commons)


Reply to: pers-942106801@craigslist.org [?]
Date: 2008-12-02, 1:51PM EST


I passed the World AIDS Day display a couple of times. With all the outlining I've been doing, I need to blow off some steam, and the condoms were calling to me. I grabbed a handful.

Any North Grounds women interested in sharing the wealth? I am tall, clean and good-looking. Also, very discreet. This will just be between us.

Please be attractive, fit, clean and discreet(smart is understood). Like I mentioned, I've got a handful, so I'm looking for more than just a one-study-break-stand.

Tall, clean, AND good looking. Damn boy you a catch. Studying at B&N today we overheard some callipygian undergrads lamenting the lack of dating options for them. Head down there, throw the pile of condoms on the study table, and say "I'm in law school, b**tch." The rest will work itself out.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

This guy owes it to us all to report back on whether his sketchiness succeeded.

Anonymous said...

Guy? Could be a chick with a dick.

Anonymous said...

Well done, 10:17. Crass, insensative, thoughtless.

Anonymous said...

11:03 = law school chick.

Anonymous said...

"Insensative (sic)"?

If anything, 10:17 was sensitive to that fact that not all people who wear condoms are men.

Anonymous said...

Ugh, past 10:17's spelling error he or she is completely correct. 11:29, you don't think a guy might think 10:17's comments were insensitive? Do we still think women have a monopoly on sensitivity?

And, 12:52, is that a joke? Come on. If 10:17 actually had such people in mind his or her comment would move well past insensitive to full blown mean.

Anonymous said...

Yes. Obviously that was a joke. Chill.

Anonymous said...

I have my suspicions on the identity, and I'm going to be trolling the stacks in the library til I find him, candid camera style.

Anonymous said...

Any word on whether last year's cute 1L library hookup couple have plans for another rendezvous in the cellphone room this year?

concerned student said...

to 6:27--

just as we don't want to generalize and assume that women have sensitivity monopolized, we likewise shouldn't assume that men account for all condom usage. acknowledging the needs of shemales, regardless of their small % of total population, does them a far greater service than denying their existence in order to spare any feelings.

the shemale community, despite individuals like 6:27 and their rampant biogotry, is thriving today. they are mobilized and commercialized, exploiting the same societal curiosity that once bred discrimination into enterprise and profit.

i suggest 6:27 visit www.trannysurprise.com to cure herself of such inexcusable ignorance and intolerance. maybe the "surprise" she'll find is open-mindedness.

i have login information if anyone would like to see the member's section.

ywia.

Anonymous said...

Ummm, I believe that 6:27 was objecting to referring to the members of this community as "chicks with dicks," as that term is potentially offensive.

Aside from the fact that 2:31 has, in my opinion, misunderstood 6:27, he or she is right about this growing community and their right to respect. I just think it is this right to respect that motivated 6:27's comments.

Anonymous said...

Wait... 2:31 is shtick right? Login info to a transexual porn site? That's...umm.. interesting...

Concerned Student said...

i like to stay informed.


...yes, schtick.


a wooo ooo

Anonymous said...

Is "chicks with dicks" not the politically correct terminology?

Anonymous said...

It's sad that so many of the comments that us law students make are so offensive, ignorant and hurtful. Half of the comments seem like they are coming from 6 year old bullies.